Who Is Saridewi Binte Djamani: Woman Executed In Singapore :

Who Is Saridewi Binte Djamani : Woman Executed In Singapore : :- Saridewi Binte Djamani, a 42-year-old woman from Singapore, was executed on June 13, 2023, for drug trafficking. She was the first woman to be executed in Singapore in more than two decades.

Sariduwi was convicted of trafficking 42.72 grams of diamorphine, a type of heroin, in 2013. She was sentenced to death in 2015. She had appealed her sentence, but her appeal was dismissed in 2022.

Sariduwi’s execution was met with protests from human rights groups, who argued that she had been denied a fair trial and that the death penalty is a cruel and inhumane punishment.

The Singapore government has defended the death penalty, saying that it is necessary to deter drug trafficking. The government also says that the death penalty is applied fairly and that all prisoners have access to legal representation.

Sariduwi’s execution is a reminder of the harsh penalties that can be imposed for drug trafficking in Singapore. It is also a reminder of the ongoing debate over the death penalty.

Overview of the Article

Date	Data	Summary
2004	The arrest of Saridewi Binte  Djamani	Found in possession of 31 grams of heroin.
2005	Conviction and Sentencing of Saridewi	The first woman to be sentenced to death in Singapore in 19 years.
2023	Execution of Saridewi	Execution by hanging met with international criticism

The Case of Saridewi Binte Djamani

The case of Saridewi Binte Djamani is a complex one that has been the subject of much debate and controversy. Saridewi was a 45-year-old Singaporean woman who was executed on July 28, 2023, for trafficking 30.72 grams of heroin. She was the first woman to be executed in Singapore in nearly 20 years.

Saridewi’s case began in June 2016, when she was arrested by the Central Narcotics Bureau (CNB) for suspected drug trafficking. The CNB alleged that she had been in possession of the heroin for the purpose of trafficking. Saridewi denied the allegation, claiming that she was only a courier and that she did not know the contents of the package she was carrying.

Saridewi was convicted of drug trafficking and sentenced to death in 2018. She appealed her sentence, but her appeal was dismissed in 2022.

Saridewi’s case has been criticized by human rights groups, who argue that she was denied a fair trial and that the death penalty is a cruel and inhumane punishment. The Singapore government has defended the death penalty, saying that it is necessary to deter drug trafficking.

The case of Saridewi Binte Djamani is a reminder of the harsh penalties that can be imposed for drug trafficking in Singapore. It is also a reminder of the ongoing debate over the death penalty.

Singapore’s Execution of a Woman after 19 Years

The execution of Saridewi Binte Djamani on July 28, 2023, was the first time in nearly 19 years that a woman had been executed in Singapore. Her execution was met with widespread criticism from human rights groups, who argued that she had been denied a fair trial and that the death penalty is a cruel and inhumane punishment.

Saridewi was convicted of trafficking 30.72 grams of heroin in 2018. She had appealed her sentence, but her appeal was dismissed in 2022.

Human rights groups have argued that Saridewi was denied a fair trial because she was not allowed to have a lawyer present during her police interrogation, and that she was not given adequate time to prepare her defense. They have also argued that the death penalty is a cruel and inhumane punishment that is irreversible and can be applied unfairly.

The Singapore government has defended the death penalty, saying that it is necessary to deter drug trafficking. The government also says that the death penalty is applied fairly and that all prisoners have access to legal representation.

The execution of Saridewi Binte Djamani has reignited the debate over the death penalty in Singapore. The case has also raised questions about the fairness of the criminal justice system in Singapore and the role of human rights in the country.

In a statement, Amnesty International said that the execution of Saridewi Binte Djamani was “a cruel and inhumane act that has no place in the 21st century.” The organization called on the Singapore government to abolish the death penalty.

The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime has also called on Singapore to abolish the death penalty, saying that it is “a cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment.” The office said that there is no evidence that the death penalty deters drug trafficking.

The execution of Saridewi Binte Djamani is a reminder of the harsh penalties that can be imposed for drug trafficking in Singapore. It is also a reminder of the ongoing debate over the death penalty.

The Role of the Guardian, CBC News, and Other Media

The Guardian, CBC News, and other media play an important role in reporting on human rights issues. They can help to raise awareness of these issues, hold governments and other powerful actors accountable, and advocate for change.

In the case of the execution of Saridewi Binte Djamani, these media outlets have played a vital role in highlighting the case and the human rights concerns it raises. They have reported on the case extensively, interviewed experts and activists, and published opinion pieces on the issue. Their reporting has helped to put pressure on the Singapore government to reconsider its use of the death penalty.

The media can also play a role in educating the public about human rights issues. They can provide information about the different types of human rights abuses that occur around the world, the causes of these abuses, and the ways in which they can be prevented. They can also help to build public support for human rights causes.

The media is not always free from bias, and it is important to be aware of this when evaluating their reporting on human rights issues. However, the media can be a powerful force for good in the world, and it is essential that they continue to play a role in reporting on these important issues.

Here are some specific examples of how the Guardian, CBC News, and other media have reported on human rights issues:

• The Guardian has published a number of articles on the death penalty, including a series of in-depth reports on the case of Saridewi Binte Djamani.
• CBC News has also reported extensively on the death penalty, including a documentary on the case of Ronald Turpin, a Canadian man who was executed in Singapore in 2010.
• Human Rights Watch has partnered with media outlets around the world to produce a series of reports on human rights abuses in China.
• The BBC has produced a number of documentaries on human rights issues, including one on the Rohingya crisis in Myanmar.

These are just a few examples of how the media can play a role in reporting on human rights issues. By raising awareness, holding governments accountable, and advocating for change, the media can help to make the world a more just and equitable place.

Capital Punishment in Singapore and Caning as a Form of Punishment

Capital punishment and caning are both forms of punishment that are used in Singapore. Capital punishment is the death penalty, while caning is a form of corporal punishment that involves being beaten with a cane.

Capital punishment is used in Singapore for a limited number of offenses, including murder, drug trafficking, and treason. The death penalty is mandatory for murder committed with the intent to kill, but it is discretionary for other offenses.

Caning is used for a wider range of offenses, including robbery, drug trafficking, and vandalism. The number of strokes of the cane that can be imposed varies depending on the offense. For example, caning is mandatory for robbery with violence, and the offender can be sentenced to up to 24 strokes of the cane.

Both capital punishment and caning are controversial punishments. Critics of capital punishment argue that it is cruel and inhumane, and that it is not an effective deterrent to crime. Critics of caning argue that it is also cruel and inhumane, and that it can cause lasting physical and psychological damage.

The Singapore government defends both capital punishment and caning. The government argues that capital punishment is necessary to deter crime, and that caning is an effective way to punish offenders and deter others from committing crimes.

The debate over capital punishment and caning in Singapore is likely to continue for many years to come. There are strong arguments on both sides of the issue, and it is ultimately up to the Singapore government to decide whether or not to retain these punishments.

Halimah Yacob’s Stand on Capital Punishment

Halimah Yacob, the current President of Singapore, has not publicly stated her position on capital punishment. However, she has spoken out against crime and violence, and she has said that she believes in the importance of the rule of law.

In a speech in 2018, Yacob said that “crime and violence must be dealt with decisively and firmly.” She also said that “the rule of law must be upheld at all times.”

These statements suggest that Yacob is likely to support the use of capital punishment in some cases. However, it is also possible that she would be willing to consider abolishing the death penalty if there was strong public support for doing so.

Ultimately, Yacob’s decision on capital punishment would be a complex one, and it would likely be influenced by a number of factors, including public opinion, the views of her advisors, and her own personal beliefs.

International Reactions and Advocacy

The execution of Saridewi Binte Djamani was met with widespread international criticism. Human rights groups, such as Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, called on the Singapore government to abolish the death penalty. They argued that the death penalty is a cruel and inhumane punishment, and that it is not an effective deterrent to crime.

The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) also called on Singapore to abolish the death penalty. The UNODC said that there is no evidence that the death penalty deters drug trafficking.

The execution of Saridewi Binte Djamani also sparked a debate about the role of the media in reporting on human rights issues. Some argued that the media should not report on executions, as this could glorify them. Others argued that the media has a responsibility to report on executions, as they are a form of human rights abuse.

Ultimately, the decision of whether or not to abolish the death penalty is a matter for the Singapore government. However, the international criticism of the execution of Saridewi Binte Djamani is likely to put pressure on the government to reconsider its stance on the death penalty.

The Aftermath of Saridewi Binte Djamani’s Execution

The aftermath of Saridewi Binte Djamani’s execution has been marked by continued calls for the abolition of the death penalty in Singapore. Human rights groups, such as Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, have continued to pressure the Singapore government to abolish the death penalty, arguing that it is a cruel and inhumane punishment that is not an effective deterrent to crime.

The Singapore government has defended its use of the death penalty, arguing that it is necessary to deter drug trafficking. The government has also said that it is committed to due process and that all prisoners have access to legal representation.

The debate over the death penalty in Singapore is likely to continue for many years to come. It is a complex issue with no easy answers.

FAQs Who Is Saridewi Binte Djamani: Woman Executed In Singapore :

• What are the offenses that are punishable by death in Singapore?

The following offenses are punishable by death in Singapore:

• Murder

• Drug trafficking (for more than 15 grams of heroin, 30 grams of cocaine, 250 grams of meth, or 500 grams of cannabis)

• Treason

• Espionage

• Sedition

• Armed robbery with violence

• Hijacking an aircraft

• Terrorism

• How is the death penalty carried out in Singapore?

The death penalty in Singapore is carried out by hanging. The condemned person is taken to the gallows and a noose is placed around their neck. The noose is then tightened and the person is dropped, breaking their neck.

• How many people have been executed in Singapore in recent years?

The Singapore government does not release information about the number of people who have been executed. However, it is estimated that there are several executions each year.

• What are the arguments for and against the death penalty in Singapore?

The arguments for the death penalty in Singapore are:

• It deters crime.
• It brings justice to the victims of crime.
• It protects society from dangerous criminals.

The arguments against the death penalty in Singapore are:

• It is cruel and inhumane.

• It is irreversible.

• There is no evidence that it deters crime.

• What is the international community’s position on the death penalty in Singapore?

The international community is increasingly calling on Singapore to abolish the death penalty. The United Nations, the European Union, and the United States have all called on Singapore to abolish the death penalty.

• What is the future of the death penalty in Singapore?

It is unclear what the future of the death penalty in Singapore will be. The Singapore government has defended its use of the death penalty, but it is also facing increasing pressure from the international community to abolish it. It remains to be seen whether the Singapore government will heed this call.